5 Questions

1.  The opposing viewpoint of my article is that eBooks are bad and real books are better.
2.  The ethos of her article is her personal experience of being crippled. It could be more effective/ relatable if more of the population was in her situation.
3.  The logos of her article is that people who are older, disabled, or can't see as well can use these.  While this is logical, not many people can relate.
4.  The pathos of her article is that she uses sympathy to make the audience feel bad for her and put them in her shoes.  I think this is an effective way to use pathos.
5.  Although Schoop has a strong argument, I think Carr's is more effective because her argument only targets individuals that are disabled, older, immobile, or have bad eyesight.