The first
two chapters of The Shallows is trying to lay out information
for the reader, and show the strong impact technology has been in Carr's life.
I think that the first chapter goes through the stages of advancing
technology. For example, Carr says that he went from having a MacBook
computer for games and limited internet time, to carrying a laptop like it was
nothing. I think this is the story for a lot of people during this time.
When technology first came around, it was not very widely used. Carr’s story shows how quickly it
progressed. He does say that technology
has rapidly expanded, but does not necessarily state that he thinks it is a bad
thing. Throughout both chapters I think
Carr may be leaning towards technology being a negative thing, but is mostly
laying out information for the reader.
He states in the first chapter that he feels he can no longer be
attentive to long articles. Carr
believes this is due to his increased technology use. I do not disagree that this could be a
factor, but I believe being able to access mass amounts of information in a
short amount of time has been a good thing.
In the first chapter I agree with the fact that technology advanced very
quickly and became a large part of people’s lives. However, I do not believe technology is a bad
thing. Technology can have its
negatives, for example discouraging kids from playing outside, it can be
distracting, or can lessen face to face communication. I think it is a good thing because it has
allowed us to accomplish things faster, find more information, and communicate
with people we may not have been able to before technology. In chapter two, I think Carr is somewhat
taking a stance against technology. In
this chapter, he is laying out an overwhelming amount of information concerning
research about the brain. A main idea in
this chapter is that as a child, your brain can be molded and changed, but once
you hit a certain point, it hardens and begins to age with you. I think this is false because no matter how
old you are; I believe you can still be reprogrammed to fulfill a need. Carr outlines this concept in the chapter
with the anecdote about Nietzsche. He
tells the story of how Nietzsche went blind and having a type writer
essentially saved him by allowing him to continue putting his thoughts and
teachings on paper. I believe that the
brain, at any age, can be taught anything if the action is repeated multiple
times. I think that Carr is attempting
to show that the brain is malleable, but the internet may be decreasing its
ability. I somewhat agree with Carr’s
thought about the brain. I believe that
the internet could possibly be lessening human ability to mold the brain at
older ages, but I do not think it completely prevents molding. In these chapters, Carr does make valid
points. I see both sides of the argument
and agree in some ways, and disagree in others.
I think that so far Carr has stated his opinion, but through the
information he provided.
I agree that the brain stays pliable throughout life. Carr explains that the neurons in your brain can constantly make new attachments and make you learn new things and create new habits, as he and his colleagues do (at the beginning of the first chapter when he recalls no longer being able to sit still and be immersed in a good novel) when they are subject to the internet for an extended period of time. Their attention span seems to have lessened due to the quick and fast-paced internet and the speed at which information can be fed, detailed reading is no longer needed but only quick skimming. I think you put it well about what Carr's intentions are in the first two paragraphs and I also agree with you that Carr paints a slightly more "depressing" picture of the internet and technology. I believe that it is more helpful than he seems to think that it is.
ReplyDelete